Friday, January 11, 2013

Part Three - The River Shannon


DANCING WITH GHOSTS: A CROSS-CULTURAL EDUCATION

Part Three – The RIVER SHANNON

WHITE CULTURE – IRELAND

The Lone Ranger and Tonto walk into a crowded bar on the reserve. “Looks like we're surrounded, Tonto,” the Lone Ranger says to his loyal sidekick. “What do you think we should do?” And Tonto answers: “What do you mean 'we,' Kemo Sabe?“

So the class had challenged me about White culture and I had to come up with a better answer. I had to learn.
     You know that expression? When the student is ready, the teacher appears. It was almost like that. As a student of cultures, I was ready to learn, and the opportunity to do so appeared. Or perhaps it was just Fate, finding another way to tap me on my shoulder, to get me up and moving, to teach me a lesson. Through contacts living and working on the reserve, I had the opportunity to fly to Ireland for the Christmas holiday. It is a long story, and the details of how I got there are less important than the details of what I learned there. Forget the heightened security, the hand frisks and pat downs, the long slow line-ups transferring from Air Canada to Aer Lingus, the snowstorm which closed Heathrow on the return trip. Sleeping with ten thousand other stranded travellers on the airport's marble floor.
     Flying into Dun Laoghaire, to Dublin Airport. Dun is a fort (as in Lon DUN), Laoghaire sounds like "leery." DUB means black in Gaelic. LIN is a waterfall, or a pool into which water falls. The drive out, to Clara, County Offaly, through towns with names like songs or poems. Mul LIN gar. Tul la more. Lough something. Lough everywhere. Lough sounds like “loch” and means "lake," I am told. It does NOT rhyme with "slough," it does NOT sound like "Loo." That means something else. Although moving to the reserve, the smell of woodsmoke, had evoked comfortable memories of my own childhood, arriving in Ireland felt literally as if I had returned. Many people there, out of habit, greet strangers with “Welcome home!” Although I had never before been off the North American continent, I definitely experienced deja vu in Ireland. And everywhere I went it seemed that people told me “St. Bridget slept here!”
     “WHO?” I kept asking. “WHO?”
     Bridget had been my childhood nickname, a corruption of our family name, but I had never before met a woman named Bridget. I had heard of Bridget Bardot, who was famous, but I had never heard of the celebrated St. Bridget, one of the three patron saints of Ireland, along with Patrick and Columba.
     The children were learning Gaelic at school; giant posters, next to the ones reading Guinness in Good For You! proclaimed OUR Language: It's part of who we are! The elders spoke with a musical lilt, and sang at the drop of a hat. Indeed, I had been warned to have a tune ready, as visitors are expected to “give us your song” almost as the price of admission to the pub. People cooked on an “aga” fueled by peat which had been dug with square shovels from the bog and delivered to the back door in sacks. It had its own smoke smell, not unlike but not the same as woodsmoke. It was Christmas so we ate Brussels sprouts, broccoli (which I actually saw growing in a garden, the first time ever), cabbage, potatoes with butter and parsley, bangers and mash, rashers of bacon, ham, colcannon, bubble and squeak. We peeled shrimp, and I got so hooked on Bailey's Irish Cream that upon my return to Winnipeg I pestered the Manitoba Liquor Control Commission to import it. Finally, after repeated requests, they informed me that they would be getting it in as soon as the manufacturers had devised a way to stabilize the cream for export. Yes! St. Bridget would have been proud of me, she of the magic cauldron, of the community pasture and the milk cows, of the church at Kildare, the Church of the Oak, or, more specifically, the Oak Door.
     So I was fascinated by the outward and visible signs of culture in Ireland, but I also learned how woefully inadequate was my knowledge of Irish history. How my quest in the pastures and watchtowers was for stereotypes, Darby O'Gill and the Little People, played by that handsome Scots devil, Sean Connery. How blind I was to the invisible strengths, the underlying values and beliefs of a proud Celtic people. Celtic was the word. Wherever I went I was snapping photos of Celtic crosses. I know there are a lot of Celtic crosses in Canada, but I hadn't been aware of them at the time. It is a regular cross with a circle centred where the horizontal and vertical axises intersect. Some say it is a Christian cross representing the Tree of Life, enlightened by the pagan Sun.
     The Celts I learned were one of the ancient peoples of Europe who had come from the east and had lived in Portugal, Spain, and France, and on all of the “British” islands, including Ireland, which was no longer a “British” island. Driven back they were, history tells us, by marauding Angles, Saxon, Jutes, Vikings, to the western regions—Cornwall, Wales, Ireland, and northern Scotland.
     This is where I began to recognize the inadequacy of “my accursed human education,” including years studying history at university. I did not realize the differences between the peoples united as “British.” I did not know that a Scot was neither an Englishman nor an Irishman, and that to refer to Ireland as “British” was a great error, more than fifty years out of date even then, and an insult to boot, although even the National Geographic magazine made that mistake in that decade, the 1970s. The Celts had been in Ireland for a millennia when the Vikings began to intrude. The Vikings are the reasons some Irish have red hair, and the reason why the tinker children I saw begging outside the mall were blond and red-headed. The Viking invaders were followed by the Normans, and the English dominance was consolidated under the Tudors, the Henrys VII and VIII, and Elizabeth I. Resistance never ceased and was always strongest when England was engaged elsewhere, during the English Civil War and the French Revolution and World War I. Cromwell's repression of Catholic Ireland in the 1600s was especially brutal. English courtiers had been rewarded with title to Irish lands.
     That's why the landowners, the English, were blamed for the Irish potato famine in the 1800s, for they had money and food and refused to share with the suffering peasants who were given the choice to die or emigrate. The Irish and their Catholic faith were considered inferior, as Dr. Swift had made so obvious in his satirical "Modest Proposal" as early as 1729. The fate of the Irish did not matter to their “superiors”; there was no sense of a shared humanity. Well, some of this I picked up later from reading Nuala O'Faolain, My Dream of You, so there may be a bit of bias here. But that sense of being victims, victimized by the beliefs and actions of others, and the anger that engenders, was evident. They had been invaded and conquered and colonized by people who considered themselves to be superior.
     We listened to a traditional Irish band called the Wolfe Tones, named for a rebel hero from centuries before. And when a car backfired on a side street in Dublin, I watched the shopkeeper cringe and duck. She apologized; “It's the Troubles,” she said. There was trouble in England related to the on-going Troubles in the North, citizens split between those wanting independence and those who wanted to remain a part of the United Kingdom. In the North, they say, there are two religions. Anti-Catholic and Anti-Protestant. Postcards arrived in Winnipeg from “bomby” Belfast. So the cringing woman in the shop felt she had to explain.
     “People don't know the difference,” she complained. “Dublin has nothing to do with the Troubles in the North, but when people don't know the difference, who knows what they may do? We fear retaliation.” And although it was true that Eire had nothing to do with the Troubles in Northern Ireland, it was also true that in Ireland, the Garda, heavily armed police carrying automatic rifles and machine guns, driving around in armoured police vehicles, were everywhere, not just at the airport. And a rash of robberies in the banks in small towns in the South were rumoured to be organized by supporters sending money to those fighting in the North. Rebel politics is “just a place for criminals to congregate,” the men in the pub suggested, the way we explain “gangs” in Canada. But that could have been just their party line, not wanting to scare the tourists.
     You know that old movie Ryan's Daughter starring Robert Mitchum and Sarah Miles and John Mills? Beautiful. Beautiful country. Even at Christmas, everything was green. Grass. Ivy. Furze. Gardens. But Ryan's Daughter is about a British soldier suffering from “shellshock” posted to Ireland during World War I, to give him a bit of peace and time to recover from the horrors of the trenches. One of the subplots concerns gun-running, the Irish in America supporting the Irish in Ireland supporting the Germans in Germany, on the theory that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” I missed the nuances of power and politics at first. I didn't realize that the reason America took so long to enter World War I was because it couldn't make up its mind, it could have gone either way, siding with the Germans or with the British. Siding with the British would mean the loss of many Irish-American votes. But I was oblivious, being more interested then in other themes, the personal rather than the political, the weight of tradition and the social pressures of community on the daughter, the younger generation. The love story. The wounded hero.
     There are things you miss, especially the first time. My first trip to Ireland, I never once thought about Sean O'Casey or William Butler Yeats, both writers I had studied, or even George Bernard Shaw. I must have walked along the River Liffey in Dublin on my way to the Guinness factory, but I never even thought about James Joyce or Leopold Bloom or Bloomsday. When I bought stamps or exchanged money at the main post office, I never thought about the strikers who had occupied the building during the battle for Home Rule. Probably not until I read Roddy Doyle's A Star Called Henry. Nor was I even aware that my own grandmother's grandfather was posted in Dublin at the time of his death in the 1880s, although he died aboard his ship somewhere in the West Indies. So many connections; so many missed opportunities.
     For these are all parts of White culture. Ancestors. Ancestral homelands. Ancestral employment and residences. Values and rivalries and motivations. Literature and stories in film, and writers. History and politics. Faith and religion. Legend and mythology. Customs and rituals. Laws, by-laws, and police. Role models. Outward and visible signs.
     Every night at six o'clock, the Angelus came on the television, and everyone was supposed to stop and pray. I missed Christmas Eve's Midnight Mass in the big church at the centre of the town because, with seating being limited and baby-sitters unavailable and me not being a true believer, I was nominated to stay at the house with the sleeping children. There was no Boxing Day. December 26 was called St. Stephen's Day. Mummers dressed in Halloween-like costumes and masks came to the door. I think they were given money. A light was always left on near the front door at night, “to aid lost souls trying to find their way home.” Ruined buildings were left in a tumble of fallen rock and rubble. If you used old stones in a new building, a special ceremony was required, speaking to the spirits of the ruins, asking them to stay, or inviting them to the new location. A Black Day was not a day when the shops are closed but rather a day when the pubs do not open. Twice a year, I believe, on Christmas Day and Good Friday. Perhaps it was just that our host was such a silver-tongued storyteller, had literally kissed the Blarney Stone, that I missed the twinkle in his eye as he answered all my questions.
     We attended a medieval banquet in a stone castle, stabbing our capons with daggers, eating syllabub milk pudding with carved wooden spoons. Evidently forks are post-medieval. We visited Clonmacnoise Monastery on the River Shannon, where it is possible, fifteen hundred years ago, St. Bridget propositioned St. Patrick, on that long-ago first Leap Year proposal. He of course declined, being more interested in snakes himself. St. Patrick's legend is more familiar on this side of the Atlantic, but every kitchen in Ireland sports a St. Bridget's Cross, woven by her nuns from reeds from the river, and sold as a way to support the nunnery. Mine still hangs above the buffet, although I think tradition says it should be tacked to the ceiling, above you as you work at the kitchen sink, like a star.

So what does a trip to Ireland have to do with solidarity with First Nations people? Well, a trip to Ireland, a voyage into another culture, helped me see things I hadn't noticed or been aware of in Canada. In Ireland I saw and felt the connection between colonialism and racism. Ireland through history had been colonized, yet it still existed, proud, a role model of cultural survival. Irish history suggests that when pain goes unacknowledged and abuses and grievances go unaddressed, violence may be the only voice to which the colonial oppressor listens. Violence directed at the self or violence towards others. The Irish attempted to address their oppression through political channels and through literature, but in the end only armed insurrection succeeded, challenging the external authority of a conquering nation, fighting for the return of independence and self-determination. The Irish proclaimed that things which had been done in the past were wrong, and that those actions, those wrongs, were wrong because they were based on racist assumptions which denied the humanity and the dignity of the colonized people.
     As Oprah always used to say, When we know better, we can do better.
     So Ireland was a turning point in my cross-cultural education. In Ireland, Irish rebels and rebel songs proclaimed that racism is wrong, and that it is right, even expected, to fight against colonialism, to stand in solidarity against oppression, and with other oppressed peoples desiring respect for their rights as equal human beings.

WHITE CULTURE

Like a medium in which things grow in a laboratory, culture is the way we live and grow together. Of course, there is no “White Culture” because there are many White cultures. It's just that, in former British colonies, a lot of the customs and rituals of the dominant English have been established as the cultural norm. Or old French culture in Quebec, from before the French Revolution, when most of the Quebecois families emigrated to New France. It was true even in my own family. I really was not aware of my own personal and ancestral culture. Although both my grandmothers were English, born in England, I did not realize that my Bridgeman ancestors came from Cornwall, a Celtic region of Britain, where the last native-speaker of the Cornish language died in the 1790s. I did not realize that the way my father served pancakes, under a mountain of whipped cream, sprinkled with brown sugar or fruit, is called “Cornish pancakes” in Britain. I didn't even know I had Celtic blood, before I flew into Ireland, before I walked in the footsteps, slept in the places where Bridget slept. Our Celtic heritage had been whitewashed, overpainted, obliterated beneath the “English” mean.
     So, instead of White Culture, let's just call it culture. What constitutes culture? What are its categories, the things all cultures have? Because certainly by now we've all slept in so many different beds that there is no one “pure laine” culture left, unadulterated, original. If such a thing ever did exist. The details, the emanations, for individuals and for groups, will differ, but underlying structures will be the same or similar. Start from the individual and work outward, rather than from outside, looking in. We are all the same but different.
     We each enter this world as an individual infant, surrounded by birth rituals, a parent, parents, or family, with child-rearing practices, traditional ways of educating and acculturating the children, using some variation of observation, instruction, immersion, story, legend, and mythology. Children pick up attitudes, ethical tenets, philosophy, perhaps religion, spiritual practice, along with superstitions. Routine, ritual, ceremony make the child feel accepted and help develop the skills to anticipate and manage his or her needs. Every group has a type of shelter, clothing, and food preferences—getting, preparing, serving—related to the environment in which it lives. We learn a language and other methods of communication, ways to work, tools to work with, ways to socialize through play and games, ways to organize group interactions, initiation rites, courtship, marriage, and death rituals. And an attitude towards what happens afterward, physically and spiritually. What else is there? Is it not true that every culture, every people on Earth have these? We grow up immersed in the details of our family culture. We may or may not be aware that the family cultures of other people may or may not differ from our own. When we see alternate ways of doing things, when different bathing rituals are pointed out to us, we may choose to adapt or to adopt or to ignore. When we are aware of differences, we will be less likely to assume that any one way is superior.
     Is it safe to assume that each individual and each culture feels, thinks, believes that he/she/it has a right to refuse, a right not to be forced to accept the culture of another group? And what is the connection between culture and place, now that we know groups of humans have roamed, moved, migrated over the continents for as long as people have been on Earth? They say that even the Celts may have started out somewhere near India. At least, some of the clues in the ancient languages suggest this. Perhaps computers reading genes will add to our understanding of the facts of the human story. However, the important truths lie elsewhere. In the crimes of racism and colonization, in the resistance of colonized nations, and in the assertion of their rights to determine their own future.
     There are ways that we are all the same, and ways that we differ. And differing is all right. Sometimes, it seems, it's only the differences which set us apart, give us our identity. “Did you bring this snow with you?” they asked this Canadian in Ireland.

WHOSE RIGHTS?

Ireland at Midwinter was green and open, what the Celts call a “thin place” where the separation between this world and other worlds is a thin veil. I felt this especially at the old monastery, Clonmacnoise on the River Shannon, where some of the buildings, the stones that construct them, were stacked in the fifth century CE and where the high Celtic cross, which dates from the eighth century, is decorated with cartwheels identical to those in our barnyard at home. I had dreams after I visited the monastery. An earthquake. The world falling apart. Three white-robed priests standing along the long axis of a crooked Celtic cross. Pilgrims on our knees approaching them. When I get there, a hand waving over my head, fingers raised, an arm directing me to one side: “You're saved,” a voice says, “because your eyes are the colour of the Birr marble.” It was, or might as well have been, all Gaelic to me, but I asked our host.
     “Birr marble? Why, yes. 'Tis a stone mined near the town of Birr, just down the road from Clonmacnoise. The Birr marble is green, with flecks of rust and red.”
     Okay. I'll go a bit lighter on the Guinness.
     But sometimes, there is one memory which makes me shiver. At the airport. Being patted down, my carry-on and purse being hand-frisked. The security guard noticing my month's supply of birth control. She looks up, looks me in the eyes, and says: ”Have a good time in Ireland.” I did not know then that birth control was illegal in Ireland, that it was against the law to have it, and to bring it in. What if she had told me that? What if she had confiscated my supply? What could I have done? How would my life have changed? Was I exempt, as a non-citizen? Or would I have been a victim of that old democratic system, where the larger number, the louder voices, outvoted me, imposed upon me their opinions, and forced me to exist according to their laws? Considered me inferior and without rights? Without the ability or the right to determine my own fate?
     Now some of you may be thinking, Was she married? Because some of you, dear readers, may believe, consciously or subconsciously, that a woman has to be married to have sex. And/or to access birth control, which used to be the law in Canada. And that society has to approve, to permit it, before a woman surrenders her virginity. And even, that society has a right to approve whether, when, and with whom a woman has sex. And that the simple answer to carrying protection is that if you abstain, you do not need birth control. Right.
     One of my friends on the reserve wore a t-shirt emblazoned with “I am a virgin.* ” And when you followed the asterisk, the star, down to the frayed hemline, the footnote said “This is a very old t-shirt.” I liked her attitude. And the way she used humour to poke fun at insulting gossip, at how some people seem to feel that they have a right to intrude into private decisions and individual beliefs, and to pass judgement upon them.
     If the security guard at the London check-in counter for Aer Lingus had confiscated my birth control, had informed me of the law and applied it to me personally, I would have been angry. I would have lost my respect for the authority of the lawmakers. I would have rejected the imposition of their law upon me. I would have turned to the underground, to a Black Market. I would for sure have counselled my daughters not to be duped, to stand up for themselves. F the church. F parliament. F men in general. But always use protection. Make every child a wanted child. Make every woman a human being with rights.
     But that's my culture. Personal. Let me not assume that what I believe should be forced on others.
     Let me not, sweet St. Bridget, let me never use the word should.

MY LAST CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY

We finally got home to Winnipeg and to the North, after the blizzard in Europe, the accusations of taxi drivers and other stranded travellers: “Did you bring this snow with you from Canada?” I hand wrote an account of my holiday for my English classes. I was consciously attempting to make that connection between personal experience, communication, handwriting, and writing. And possibly, of travel as adventure. And, although it took more processing time, of travel as another way to learn to see and know yourself. Because travel helps us notice differences, ways we and our lives compare and contrast with the lives of others elsewhere. With different cultures, even amongst and between people of the same “colour” or “race.” For what I was still seeking was some way to respond to that first student's first challenge, “You White people don't got no culture.”
     What I was seeking was some sort of answer to the question: In what ways are these students in high school on the reserve any different from my previous students in other high schools elsewhere? Is the student's Cree culture already the same as mine, my whitewashed Celtic culture? Are there really no cultural differences? I was curious to know what Cree culture was, but I understood that it was not my role to say. It would be up to Matt, to identify what made him “Cree and proud.” My role would be only to help him develop the skills to communicate as much or as little as he chose with whomever he chose to share. It would be my job to document my culture, my growth, the way cross-cultural challenges helped me become more aware of my culture. How I got beyond being neither British nor American and emerged a proud citizen of a supposedly kinder gentler but colder country.

UP RIVER

The Gunisao is a river, a tributary of the Nelson, one of those rushing northern rivers, cascading ever down over worn tiers of bedrock, tracing the line of least resistance, onward, into the arms of the Bay and beyond, to the Arctic or Atlantic oceans. The Gunisao's cold waters never rest, tumbling white and frothy over and around granite outcrops, undertowing deep blue beneath a placid veneer, or lying flat and steaming in the eerie calm of dawn. The records of its ever-changing water levels are inscribed in indelible lines like petrographs on the shore.
     In the North, the landscape, rivers like the Gunisao, are teachers. As it has been for millennia, rivers get you where you want to go. The Gunisao can get you away from headlights and traffic lights, from streetlights, airport beacons, the flashers on ambulances, school buses, police cars. The Gunisao takes you inland, far from civilization. InLand, into the Bush. For some people, the bush is where they make their living, trapping, or where they go to hunt for food. For others, the bush is where you go to get away, to camp. Not right into the bush, obviously, where you can see nothing but trees, and can find no direction indicators other than the sun and stars. You camp on the edge of the bush, between the known and the unknown, between the river and the trees. And the river takes you there.
     Fishermen set their long nets where the Gunisao joins the Nelson. They never venture upriver to fish, nor to camp. The Gunisao only lets you go so far in a large motor boat. Those who are serious about camping, about getting out into the bush, travel in a canoe. Because a canoe, even the modern Grumman we were in, seamless aluminum, almost impervious to the ruinous caress of floating logs or submerged boulders, rides over top of many unseen dangers. Or a canoe can be led, like a dog on a leash, by laden paddlers walking it through white water. Or, in the worst cases, a canoe can be carried, its yoke resting on the shoulders of one man or two. Canoes this river allows through, one way or the other.
     The last time I went camping, up the Gunisao, the Grumman had a small outboard motor on the stern. A canoe with a motor doesn't go much faster than good paddlers can paddle, but it makes the trip, although somewhat noisier, a little less exhausting. The motor takes you a little farther perhaps, than you would go on manpower alone. Of course, canoeists always carry paddles as well, for back-up, or for poling or steering, or sneaking quietly up on wild creatures drinking or fishing down at the shore. 
     But the river still tells you to stop before dark, to choose a good campsite, with flat open space to pitch the tent, and soft sand or boughs for the sleeping bags. Because you need light in order to gather deadfall for firewood, to cook and eat and wash dishes, and to stash the cache away from the tent and out of bearclaw reach. And then, in this land of almost-midnight sun, you wait for night to fall, sitting calmly, breathing in the river, the spruce, the quiet. A sacred silence. Watching the world transform, or swapping raucous stories to scare away the unseen twitching ears, curious eyes peering out. Instead of whistling, you start to sing. “I'm Hen-ery the eighth I am.” Or “Frere a Jacque a. Frere a Jacque a.” Or: 
     Land of the silver birch 
     Home of the beaver 
     Where still the mighty moose  
     Wanders at will. 
     Blue lake and rocky shore.   
     I will return once more.  
     Drum ditty drum drum 
     Drum ditty drum drum 
     Drum ditty drum drum  
     Drum . . . .
     Darkness wraps you and your campsite in the comforting circle of the fire's light. Sparks, smoke, coil ever upward, above the leaning trees, gyring home to the stars.
     The last time I went up the Gunisao, in the Grumman with the little outboard motor, the propeller smashed on a hidden rock and snapped a shear pin. I had never heard of a shear pin. "They should make those things stronger," I declared indignantly, grudgingly reaching for my paddle and beginning the easier pull, with the current, towards the confluence, and town. We were past the worst white water, and the rapids too were behind us. So the river chose to teach a gentle lesson.
     I learned later that a shear pin is made to break, so that no serious damage is done to the motor, and that experienced canoeists carry extra. Plural. And know how to fix them.
     So it was an easy examination, set by this northern river. Always travel, never leave home, without paddles and an extra pin. And a companion who knows what to do with it. And a schedule that can accommodate the unexpected. And a mind open to suggestion, ears attuned to listen, eyes eager to see into the darkness. And a belief that darkness is good. And a desire to go there, to get back to it, again and again.
     Day is done.
     Gone the sun.
     From the lake.
     From the hills.
     From the sky.
     All is well.
     Safely rest.
     God is nigh.

BABY SHOWER

The year after the blond guy from the kitchen sink party took over my job, I spent a lot of time at home, trying to fit into a domestic stereotype. (Yes, the blond guy from the kitchen sink had a job, but he wanted mine, and he got it.) Yes, we are too defined by our work, our identity is too entwined with what we do and what we can do.
     That year I made my first attempt ever to bake bread. Without actual bread tins, I improvised, using a set of small glass casserole dishes. I bundled up one of the loaves and walked across the frozen Nelson to a neighbour lady's house with my proud creation. I saw my hostess smile as I handed her the mini-loaf gift, but I didn't realize it was because of its size, smaller than a cinnamon bun. It was perfect, I thought, a perfect shape, this offering. It made a hollow sound when you knocked on it. She was kind enough to save her laughter until after I left.
     As we were having tea, she told me a story about her Women's Auxiliary group at the church. Every meeting ends with tea and entertainment, she explained, and sometimes the entertainment involves opening a giant box of mystery goods collected from the affluent city homes of believers in the South and packaged up as “mission boxes” to be shipped to northern churches. The box sits there like a giant Christmas present and business is rushed through to get to “the offering.” This time, she reported, when they opened the box, it was full of women's shoes. A whole giant box of women's shoes. They started digging in and discovered that the shoes were all for the right foot. The right foot only.
     “Can you imagine,” she said, laughing still, “what they must think of us? To send us something like that?”
     At home in my domesticity, what I did do was crochet. I had found a simple pattern that I liked, and that winter I crocheted, with woven inserts and knotted fringe, six afghans. Two full sized, one for my soon to be ex-husband. One for my newly re-married brother. And four baby blankets—for my other brother's firstborn, my best friend's firstborn, my academic advisor's second, and the firstborn of a colleague and her partner who worked in the school. This latter blanket I wrapped and took as a gift to a baby shower on the reserve.
     Before I lived there, I never thought about whether baby showers happened on reserves. Certainly they were a regular part of our culture in southern and rural Manitoba, almost always held after the birth of the baby to avoid bad luck and to assist with colour choices. And most lavish for firstborns because everyone understood that clothing and bedding once outgrown would be shared with neighbours and siblings.
     So this shower ritual was relatively familiar, although the mother was from Winnipeg and her partner was from town, from the reserve. We sat in a circle around the living room. Someone sat on either side of the mother who had the baby with her. The youngest person present was awarded the honour of fetching the gifts, one at a time, from the table by the door. One assistant folded the wrapping paper and collected the ribbons; the second assistant wrote down the names of the givers and the nature of the gifts, for the thank-you list. Then each unwrapped present was passed around the circle for “oooh's and aaah's.”
     Two things that happened before the tea surprised me that evening. The first was that after the final gift was unwrapped and passed around, the mother stood up and introduced the baby to the circle. She kissed his or her forehead (I cannot remember which this was) then passed the bundle to her right and he/she went from one to the next guest, around the circle, with each woman kissing him/her on the forehead with a smile or a gesture of words which implied “Welcome to this world!” The baby was the final gift.
     The second thing which surprised me was that when the assistant had unwrapped my baby afghan, a winter white background with a plaid pattern of non-pastel non-stereotypical chocolate and tangerine stripes, with white, brown, and orange tassels, she shook the blanket out, folded it diagonally, flipped it over her shoulders like a shawl, and began to stepdance, a standing-in-place jig, with fringed edge swinging.
     Now I had seen an Indian dance.

PARTY GAME

Before I left, I attended one final party on the reserve. Everyone was sitting around, eating, drinking, talking, when the host came in with a bag of tricks and said “Let's play a game!”
     Sure. Why not? What have you got in mind?
     He held up a brown paper lunch bag which appeared to have been blown into, like a balloon, making it puff out. “Grip this here, and don't let any air escape,” he directed. Then, “The goal is to see who can come up with the best insult,” he explained. “Pretend that this bag of wind represents your worst enemy, the person you feel the most negative about in your whole life. Has everyone got a picture of that person in your mind's eye? Yes? Okay, go ahead. Pass it around. Give it your best shot. The winner will be chosen by a round of applause at the end of the circle.”
     So, gamely, we played along. It wasn't hard for me to pick a face to abuse, a fellow staff member I really felt bullied me and others. I called up my best insults and epithets. Go for it. Go all out. When everyone had taken his or her turn, the roomful of vented emotions seeming lighter already, laughter everywhere, one winner was picked, based upon his descriptive expletive-deleteds and colourful threats.
     “Okay, you win,” the host said. Then, “Here. Here is your enemy. Open the bag very carefully, and take a peek.”
     The host handed the winner the brown paper bag we had all verbally abused and we watched him open it. He peered in. He jumped back. He shook his head. He swore. He laughed. Then he re-inflated the bag, sealed it with shaking fingers, and passed it to the person beside him to have his own glimpse. By the time that the last person had sneaked his or her own peek, we all knew. The paper bag contained a shard of mirror; our worst enemies were ourselves.
     For every finger you point outwards, three point back at you.

YOU JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND


We don't always realize how much our perceived enemies, the staff bully, the “other” who is not me, may be projections of the things we do not admit or things we do not like about ourselves. Mirrors, possibly distorted, but mirrors nevertheless. In the same way, we don't always realize how much our own backgrounds, which affect our expectations and personal choices for ourselves, also affect our expectations and the alternatives we see as available to others, our students, our families, our fellow citizens. I had escaped rural poverty (although we were never poor) through university; I believed my students, who certainly had the ability if they wanted to direct it that way, should also have the opportunity to choose that route. Hadn't the authorities been telling First Nations since Big Bear's time that “Education is the new buffalo”?
     Where higher education was concerned, students on the reserve faced extra challenges. Most of their parents had attended White-run schools, some of them residential schools, against their own and their parents wishes. At least, the parents would have preferred that the government-sponsored education agreed to in the treaties could have been provided without removing the children from their families and communities. Parents who had been to residential schools were seldom really enthusiastic about promoting higher education if it would require the children to leave home. Those from the community who had left to attend university or post-secondary training usually did not return. They too disappeared, absorbed into the mainstream of employment and urban living.
     Education then could be seen as continuing to drive a wedge between parents and children, or at the very least, as causing conflict, especially between a parent with Grade Four and a student in Grade Twelve.
     “You think you're smarter than us?”
     “You think you're better than us?”
     “You want to be White?”
     Messages were received, whether they had been verbalized or not. 
     Although schools on reserves were assisted by parent committees, the curriculum was the provincial curriculum, designed elsewhere, to meet the needs of institutions of higher education and of employers, both located elsewhere, far away. Although we tried our best to adapt it to meet the individual needs of individual students in each classroom, what really were those needs? And how would we know? What will the future be like? How does anyone prepare for the unknown? And what would a Cree curriculum have looked like anyway? Besides language education? Outdoor education? Trapping? Nobody wanted to talk about the old days, the old ways. Everyone was ostensibly Christian, and had been for over one hundred years. What was there of Cree culture to insert, to augment the standard curriculum, to help Cree students retain a pride in their identity, aware of ways that they were the same but different, equally human with a unique cultural heritage?
     Cultural differences surfaced obliquely. Anxieties were revealed in questions like “How can anyone want to live alone?” They were thinking of dorm rooms and apartments, when they had only experienced full multi-generational houses. They were imagining leaving, one or two per year, alone, to go into unfamiliar cities. Didn't even the names of services available elsewhere, Indian and Metis Friendship Centres, imply lives of loneliness and isolation, frantically seeking others like themselves, alone without their families?
     What in their Cree culture would help them venture out? I remember asking a parent once, when I had overheard stories of the Cree trickster, “Who is this character Waysackayjack? Would you want your children to be like him, to behave as he does?” I remember how that parent laughed, as if there were some sort of secret I didn't get.
     Of course they would want their children to be like Waysackayjack, the parent tried to explain. He has all sorts of adventures, he gets attracted to things, he misinterprets what he sees, he rushes in without thinking, he sometimes tries to take advantage of others, but it always works out in the end. He makes a fool of himself and, by doing so, he gets people to laugh at him, and thus at themselves. When he's around, you know that nothing is going to be taken too seriously.
     Shape-shifting as a coping mechanism, a survival skill. I didn't understand.
     I remember a different parent flashing me a snapshot. I took it, twisted it around, not sure which way was up. Water. A rock wall. Red ochre like paint on the wall. A scene of creatures in a canoe. It was the closest I ever came to the local petrographs which reportedly mark one of the “thin” places, a portal, through which human beings can access the other world, the world of the Maymaykwaysa, the Little People who live in the rocks. There were myths and legends and sacred places that the people still knew about and shared with pride, but these cultural artifacts never made it into the curriculum. Like the powwow dances, they aroused ambiguous feelings about a superstitious past best left behind, relics to be relegated to a bygone era.
     The many children who did love to draw inked and pencilled sketches of the life they saw around them. Dancers. The rock group Kiss. Fish. Pineao (Spruce Grouse). Boats. Hockey games. Snowmobiles. Snowmobiles, one boy assured me, were anticipated for generations, he said, before the first Ski-doo actually arrived in the North. Predicted? Yes, the Elders knew. Someone had a vision, years and years ago, about a running chair. Riding on a running chair. So when the machines finally arrived, it was like the Elders said: What took you so long? So he drew running chairs, and shared the legend. But he was the exception.
     Waysackayjack didn't come to school, although I believe he is still hiding out on the reserves. In that way too, reserves are preserves of remnants of culture more easily lost or hidden in the towns and cities, unbeknownst to the larger culture except for anthropologists, ethnologists, and students of literature. The parents of high school students weren't thinking of Waysackayjack when they encouraged students to “Stay in school. Get a good education. Go to university. Become a teacher, a doctor, a policeman, a pilot.” When these things were said, they were said with a heavy heart which knew the implications, “and leave us.”
     “Just remember to come home and visit.”
     I didn't envy the students the tension, the palpable tension between individual and community needs, the ties which bind. Relocating the schools to the reserve community just meant that the students could attend school while living at home. But those schools were still agents of assimilation. And if the students or their parents wanted them to integrate, to be able to manage to succeed within “mainstream” capitalist Canadian society while retaining their Cree identity, they would still have to leave home to do that. To leave home for training or for employment, the dilemma faced by all rural students. Even the ones who chose to go on knew that leaving would be like jumping out of an airplane, from relative security into the great dangerous unknown.
     Would they or would they not know what to do with the cord?

CHURCH POINT


We are sitting outside at a picnic table. It is my final month in the North. The grass and the trees are a summery green. A half-ton pickup truck is parked nearby, with its tailgate down. But this is no tailgate party. Other people come and sit at the picnic table too. People from the reserve townsite. A man who works at the school, and his kids. The church is full. There is no room to sit inside. We are here but not here.
     We are sitting on the exact spot where the first missionary built the first church. Hence the name, Church Point. This may even be the original church, or its next generation. Simple straightforward frame architecture, four walls, one door, a steeple, a bell. In the 1840s, it was a Methodist Church. Today it is a United Church. This is, after all, Canada.
     James Evans, first missionary to the Cree, loved this point. A peninsula of mainland jutting into the water overlooking the spot where Little Playgreen Lake disappears into the Nelson River. When he was here, this place was abuzz. A church. A house. A school. A workshop. For he was a preacher who had the mind of an inventor. He hammered down the tin tea boxes from the Bay and soldered them together to form the first tin canoe. An old Indigenous design, translated into a new material. A technological shape-shifting. It saved him no end of down time making repairs to birchbark on his summer travels, upriver, inland, as far north and west as Fort Chip, thousands of miles of spreading the Word. He was gone for months on end, but when he returned, the people would stand on this point and point, the way the Cree do, with their chins, at the sparkling point of light, at sunbeams dancing on water. From the sun bouncing back off his tin canoe, signalling his approach, they gave the missionary the nickname which translates from the Cree as “He Who Brings the Light.”
     I love that story. The literalness. The irony. Of a time when Evans' life was good. And the story about the fur press. A fur press is a large machine built of wood. At first glance it can give you the impression of a giant corkscrew, or perhaps of the superstructure of a wishing well—two uprights around a turned twisted centre, with a handle at the side. But instead of a bucket on a rope, the handle turns a large carved wooden screw which raises and lowers a flat board. Piles of stretched tanned animal pelts are placed under the weighted board, the handle is turned, the screw presses down, flattening the piled fur, reducing the space required to store the cargo below deck, reducing the cost of shipping the traded fur back to London, where they would be transformed into fashionable top hats. James Evans looked at the fur press at the Fort and a lightbulb went off in his inventor's brain. (Of course, at that time, it would have been a candlewick flame, beginning to flicker.) Instead of a tool of the fur trade, instead of a fairy-tale wishing well, Evans saw another kind of press. He wangled an old machine, perhaps from the disapproving Factor, perhaps from the skilled-carver hands of one of his workers, and transformed it into a printing press. He carved wooden moulds of each of the syllabic forms needed to capture the Cree sounds. He melted down lead shot, poured it into the moulds, to form movable type. Pee Pay Po Paw. He set the type and printed the hymns in Cree on pages of birchbark. He bound them and placed them in the church for the congregation, after teaching them to read and write their own language. When they still referred to him with pride as “the man who taught the birchbark to speak.“
     Evans loved it here on this point, in this community. But that's the rub. Love. And it's different meanings. The impossibility of translation. The dangers of mis-communication. Of getting lost. Of offering too much. Of misconstrued nuances. Please Explain, came the message from the Methodist Conference, and he had to go. All the way back to England, where he died before he could return.
     Evidence suggests a conspiracy. That those men at the Fort, and their superiors in London headquarters, objected so strongly to the changes Evans brought that they had to collude in some way to get rid of him. Of his questioning of the authority of the Company monopoly, proudly HBC (Here Before Christ). Of his school, which kept the men and their families in town. Of his church, which instigated the Lord's Day protests, paddlers and York boat oarsmen refusing to work on Sundays. Trappers newly literate and numerate double-checking their accounts. In every way a man can think of, Evans and his ideas were bad for business. In the power struggle, the culture clash, between the capitalists who had been there since 1670 and the late-coming Christian missionary, the Hudson's Bay Company men had won.
     Mr. and Mrs. Evans went south with the brigades, to Fort Garry, Fort William, Montreal, and boarded a ship to London. It is said that his eloquence convinced the church hierarchy and the large congregations who came to hear his tales of adventure, of his good intentions, of his successes, teaching and saving of souls. But he died before he could come back, in his forty-sixth year. Rumour has it that some of his ashes have been returned. That they're buried in that little rock cairn over there. With the metal plaque, with writing in English and Cree. Some ashes. Not his body.
     The body inside that church today, the body the pick-up truck is waiting to transport to the new graveyard, is that of a boy, a young man. And his is one of four funerals this year. Teenage boys. All in high school. Dead by hanging, self-inflicted gunshot wound, a drunken fall from a half-built bridge, a suspicious unexplained drowning. Why? Alcohol? Drugs? Three of them from “broken homes,” boys without male mentors. Fostered, locally, but with siblings and relatives nearby. Trying to understand, to deduct some logic, is crazy-making.
     Don't think. Don't feel. Don't cry.
     The grief just presses down.

GRIEF

That was a long time ago. The past, as “they” say, is another country, and besides, they're all still dead. And I would stop remembering, their faces, their names--Alex, Kenny, Fred, Jeff--if I believed that that was the end of it. If someone could tell me, honestly, that kids are not still dying.
     The line from the funeral in Linden MacIntyre's The Bishop's Man brings it all back. “I'm told he wrote 'There is no future.' Think of that. . . . Think of where we have arrived as a society when those who shape the circumstances of our lives and our communities can leave our young, the very embodiment of our collective fate, in such a state. There is no future?” [p.193]
     When I first went to the reserve, had been there barely weeks, six young people drowned in one car which rolled into a water-filled ditch. And that Christmas, the fathers of two students died in a house fire, one trying to rescue the other. The hospital doled out pills to the grieving--sleeping pills, tranquilizers, anti-depressants--and kids started selling them at school. “What colour?” you could hear them whisper, negotiating a buy. “What colour?”
     And on Parents' Day, when the mother of one girl explained to me, through her translator, how happy they were to have a school, a high school, in their town, because when their kids had to attend high school outside, in a larger mainly White community, she said, “When they have to leave to go to school, they die.” I thought she meant spiritually, or symbolically. “Our children are lost to us again.” But she also meant literally. As her eldest daughter had been murdered about five years before. Gang raped by four White guys, stabbed multiple times with a screwdriver, and no one in all that time had ever been charged with her death.
     Even today, in another century, some five decades later, I cannot look at those styrofoam coolers you buy at Canadian Tire for transporting beer or fish. Coffins for babies, the kids on the reserve call them.
     But I was lucky. A Cree friend recognized my grief, and saved my life. Pulled me out of the water by the scruff of my neck, like rescuing a kitten which had been tossed into the river.
     Some years later, talking to a co-worker who was also a psychologist, questioning myself, he assured me: It would be unprofessional not to care.

MISSIONARY

A man was being interviewed, on the radio or on television, about his experiences as a Protestant missionary to a group of First Nations somewhere in northern Quebec or Ontario. He told the story of how one of his parishioners, a trapper, self-supporting, a family man, had lost a child, and had came to the mission for comfort, for words from the preacher which would help him cope with the sadness of his loss. “The man's grief was so profound,” the missionary stated, “that I realized, in that instant, that there was nothing I could offer this man, there was nothing I could teach him, there is nothing I could teach these people about being human that they do not already know."
     Yes, I thought. Perfect. They had cried together. And the missionary had abandoned his work of proselytizing, and had returned South, a wiser man. One who had peeked into the brown paper bag and recognized the face of racism in the shard of mirror. One who acted to change that face, to face the truth.

JUXTAPOSITIONS

Dancing is like taking a shower; one wrong turn and you're in hot water.”

It would be a mistake to misread my juxtapositions as my being anti-religion. I am not anti-religion. I believe religion and the fellowship faith offers is one of the long-standing ways human beings have devised to “help each other through” our time here on Earth. However, the belief, by any religion and/or all religions, that what they believe is superior to what anyone else believes is racist. And those racist assumptions are what has caused wars and human rights abuses from time immemorial, as well as personal shaming and guilt, and the depressions which arise when anger turns inward. The skeleton in the Canadian closet is racism, and it hangs with racks full of christening gowns, cassocks, and vestments.
     The late Canadian literary critic and theologian Northrup Frye pointed out that the educated imagination is one which recognizes that what he/she believes is also only a possibility. In his own words: “In the imagination our own beliefs are also only possibilities, but we can also see the possibilities in the beliefs of others.” [p.32]
     Transposing my teaching motto, I put it this way: It is not What we believe which matters; it is That we believe. [Or not, if that is what you choose to believe.]
     Here I feel perhaps I need to confess. The only thing I find more off-putting than proselytizing is pontificating.

So, I left the North believing that the best thing I could do would be to bow out. To leave the students, their parents, and their community to their own devices, to figure out for themselves how they best wanted their children educated, for the kind of lifestyle, the kind of future they envisioned.
I did feel guilty because I continued to fear that the men in charge of the schools, the men making all the decisions about who got hired, who taught what, what they taught, and how they taught it, still made decisions which seemed to imply that White ways were superior and that assimilation into White society was the answer to all “Indian” questions. Men who imposed their opinions, their gender, their culture. Men who were quick to remind everyone that everything on reserve was paid for by tax dollars from the South. That he who pays the piper calls the tune. (An old Celtic saying.)
So that nowadays, in the relationship between the Cree and Canada, between First Nations and the federal government, controlling the purse strings is the way racism is imposed, the way individuals and groups are oppressed, in that old equation of racism=superiority. Although of course, Cree culture, culture per se, exists even when money is scarce or non-existent, as most writers can tell you.
     When I left, and remember, this was more than thirty years ago, there were plans to build a new high school that would focus on training mechanics and hairdressers. But the students who wanted to prepare for university were to be removed from the community and sent elsewhere for high school. A decision which I protested, for its insensitivity. It was as if these men had never heard about the negative impacts of “residential schooling” on students, families, and communities. I do hope this plan changed, but I do not know.
      Recently I saw a news report on television which said that a student I had taught was now a principal and possibly is now an administrator. This, perhaps unreasonably, gives me a dribble of hope. As it did when I heard a First Nations leader (also cited in Regan, p.227) from a different region of Canada put it this way: “Yes, you can help us paddle, as long as you let us steer our own canoe.”

Part Four - Kettle River



DANCING WITH GHOSTS: A CROSS-CULTURAL EDUCATION


Part Four - KETTLE RIVER

YEARBOOK

George Bernard Shaw, the Irish writer who grew up as a Protestant in Dublin, said: “If you can't get rid of the skeleton in your closet, you'd best take it out and teach it to dance.”

As part of our extra-curricular activities in that school on the Cree reserve, we put together yearbooks. Individual photographs, groups, and candids of kids hamming it up, at school or at school-related activities. I used to take the yearbooks out with me when I returned to the city and to family over the summer months. People would leaf through them slowly, scanning face after face, lingering over the activity pages. One university-educated friend, a parent herself, who had possibly never lived anywhere other than south of Winnipeg, looked up at me with confusion and shock on her face.
     “What's wrong?” I asked, beginning to panic.
     “Nothing's wrong,” she said. “It's just the pictures. It's just that I've never seen Indians smiling before.”

CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION

So I began to suspect that maybe we still live “apart,” not knowing even our neighbours, let alone our fellow citizens. And that perhaps I had some valuable experience, having travelled, flown in, lived and worked on a reserve, which I could share with others. Perhaps I could be a bridge.
     I had already returned to the refuge of university and completed my Master of Arts in English, Canadian Literature, and a thesis The Indian, the “Other,” In the Canadian Quest for Identity: Four Prairie Novels of the 1970s. I looked at the way White writers incorporated First Nations and Metis characters into their stories as links, bridging us to the land, assisting the White protagonists and thence the readers to know who we are, to feel as if we belong. How they functioned as spirit guides, helping us forge a new Canadian identity through a sacred marriage to the place, the new home. "[T]he thesis suggests that some modern novelists see the necessity of learning from Indian characters both the shamanic metaphor--that man must learn to divine the mysteries of life and death--and the Metis metaphor--that we must learn to mix the ancestral presences we bring with us with those we find in the place--in order to re-establish contact with the spirit of the place. . . the sacred 'Wholly Other' within and without." [Abstract, Bridgeman, 1981] My preparation had included a look at “culture failure,” the failure of one generation to transmit its culture, its beliefs, to the next, and an attempt to define "identity." The focus was on White culture, how something seems to be missing. How counter-cultures and quests for gurus represent a frantic search for ideals to replace those which have been rejected, and for new lifestyles to match. How the only constant is change. How life skills involve the ability to sift the wheat from the chaff, to find the pony in the pile of horseshit, the sacred, the numinous, the holy buried beneath dogma and secularism. Not what we believe but that we believe.
     There are many roads leading to the same sacred centre. I never taught high school again. I proposed and assisted with the creation of a no-budget “talking heads” documentary called Mother Tongue in which educators from three or four Manitoba First Nations spoke of the importance of first languages in the schools. I published profiles of prominent First Nations individuals including broadcaster Bernelda Wheeler and MLA Elijah Harper, before the Constitutional crisis. In the city, I organized and presented informal workshops for small groups and private agencies, Cross-Cultural Communication, based on my observations from encounters with Cree people. Here are some of the things they taught me. Here are some tips on how we might be able to improve our communication with volunteers and clients.
     I found to my surprise that some White workers in the city were resistant. Especially a certain group of White women, of a certain age, as we say, with perhaps some training and experience within the helping professions. Women who considered themselves liberal. What seemed to upset them was the idea that First Nations people could be different. Could have different expectations. Could be responded to in a different way from White volunteers or White clients. These women wanted everyone to be equal and to be treated equally, by which they meant “the same.” These women seemed to believe that granting “the other” equality meant assuming they are the same as you, and assuming that you are the norm. It was as if they were giving "the other" a gift. “You're just as good as me; you are the same as me; therefore, I respect you. Imagine that!” I sensed some condescension.
     I had trouble understanding the people who were challenged by an acceptance of differences. It felt as if “they were seeing what they wanted to see.” Or, as if, without firsthand experience, or clear communication, it was easy to project the self, their own values, on to others. It was as if they had never had the benefit of a Mrs. H, pointing out facts about bathing routines. Perhaps they had never had the opportunity to observe, or they lacked the willingness to listen; perhaps it was easy not to notice differences. Perhaps, as Howard Adams points out in his “Schooling the Redman” chapter in Prison of Grass, they were used to being fed back what they wanted to hear. I guess it was the same way I felt challenged when that first student proclaimed: “I'm Cree; I am not Canadian.”
     That must be it. In cities where most of us are immigrants, everyone comes here from elsewhere. Immigrants apply to come to Canada, to become Canadian citizens, because they respect and want to live by our values and laws, to swear allegiance to our Crown. But this is not necessarily true of First Nations. They are not immigrants to Canada. They have a prior relationship to the land. They have cultures and civilizations which pre-exist "discovery" or Confederation. Most have legal relationships with “the Crown.” Their nationhood, their territorial rights, their inalienable human rights, are recognized in (but not derived from) national and international laws, treaties, constitutions. The way they have been treated in Canada since Confederation would not pass any human rights tests, yet Canadians seem oblivious or indifferent to this fact. Is it that we prefer to deal with First Nations people as individuals, to ignore the group rights, their status as nations, the confusing possibility of nations within a nation, that their continuing existence implies? To see them as the same as, not different from, ourselves?
     First Nations individuals may have different opinions. They, and their opinions, whatever they may be, deserve respect. And part of respecting is not assuming. Perhaps I had picked up that phrase on the reserve. The one which says: When you ASSUME, you make an ASS out of U and ME.

AFTER THE FALL

Like these resistant liberal White women, I had grown up in a virtually “apartheid” society, where no Indians were present in my schools or my community. Knowing virtually nothing about Canadian First Nations, their history, their languages, their cultures, their desires. Nothing about the treaties. Which treaty covered Oak River, my home town? Did the town sit in territory previously occupied by Plains Cree? Assiniboine? Dakota Sioux? I had learned nothing about the Indian Act except that it imposed federal government control over Indians and reserves in the 1870s.
     However, living on the reserve, I had learned some facts. The Norway House Cree had signed Treaty Five in 1875. And the relationship between Indians and the Crown (Canada) was governed by federal law, the Indian Act of 1876. It took me a while to recognize the differences between and the significance of these two separate documents, the treaty and the act.
     In His Majesty's Indian Allies, Robert S. Allen puts it this way: "[T]he English acknowledged that the Indians had a 'natural title' to the land which sprang from the right of soil or prior occupancy. But since they were considered a wild and heathen people, 'that live up and downe in troupes like heards of Deere in a forrest,' the English rationalized moral and legal justification for dispossessing the Indians." [p.16] Thus, the treaties dealt with the "natural title" and in Canada, the Indian Act, like the Doctrine of Discovery which sprang from papal bulls, and the American notion of Manifest Destiny, reflect the rationalizations attempting to justify dispossession and colonization. In some cases you still hear people say that "We won the war" (a fact which does not apply in Canada) is the justification for dispossession, that the victor dictates the terms. The rationalizations, which usually involve some form of "divine right" coming down from God through popes, kings, and/or superior civilizations and systems, are racism in action, the colonizing group's belief in their own superiority, translated into self-made legislation. The racist rationalizations are used to justify colonialism--"the control of one nation by 'transplanted' people of another nation--often a geographically distant nation that has a different culture and dominant racial or ethnic group." [dictionary.com]
     In recognition of "natural title," treaty negotiations arranged for ceding, surrendering control of access to their land to the Crown, to enable the Crown to manage immigration and settlement. The negotiating Indians were not naive. They bargained for something of equal value in return. Treaties guarantee that the federal government will provide the First Nations commitments such as housing, medical treatment, education, and treaty money, which usually included a gratuity per person at the time of signing and an annuity, fixed at the 1870s level, about $5 per head, handed out each Treaty Day by red-serge coated RCMP officers. Was the treaty money annuity a token, or was it meant to be a living allowance, indexed? Some treaties included the promise to “grubstake” a new way of life, training and starter supplies to raise livestock and begin farming. In the minds of the treaty-signers, they were permitting access to their ancestral land in return for government help to find new ways, to continue to live in dignity, now that the buffalo were gone. For some, welfare came to be seen as a form of treaty right because no other promised way to be able to support themselves has been forthcoming.
     In Big Bear's time, on the prairies in the 1880s, negotiations were pressured by fear of starvation. Supplies were withheld until treaties were signed, a passive-aggressive stance which was a kind of extortion, starving people into submission, a crime against humanity. Help was forthcoming only if the Indians agreed to surrender their freedom, go on to a reserve, stay there, and maintain the peace. Big Bear resisted because he could see that what the government representatives were agreeing to was not being lived up to after negotiations ended.
     Did the Indians own the land? If so, did they sell it? Cede it? Were the negotiations fair? According to Dakota tradition, I am told, land cannot be bought or sold. And the original understanding of treaty negotiations was/is: with the sacred peace pipe, to negotiate peaceful occupation and mutual usage of the land from the beginning to the end of time. Treaties in Manitoba were signed before the Indian Act was enacted in 1876, and before the influx of new settlers. The relationship between First Nations and the federal government was one of equality and mutual respect. The Indians had agreed to move over, to share. The relationship between First Nations people and settlers was based on mutual respect and assistance, with the Indians assisting the settlers.

THE BAIT AND SWITCH

The nation to nation treaty negotiations recognized aboriginal title and prepared for "mutual occupation and usage." However, then, unilaterally, the Indian Act imposed colonial status on Indians and on reserves. From being recognized as nations negotiating with the Crown, nations within a nation, the Indians became, with the sweep of a pen in Ottawa, subject, wards of the state. The Indian Act is a racist document, based upon assumed White superiority, imposed upon Indians without their consent or consultation. In the Indian Act, White officials determined that Indians were "lesser than," and would be expected to "improve themselves," to assimilate into White society, and to do so according to White rules. The legislation was a reduction, making them less than they had been, taking away self-sufficiency, self-government, self-determination. Such changes had never been part of any negotiations. Under what conditions would a people agree to give up freedom? To sign away their human rights? There are words to describe the dealers who suggest such bargains. Pimps. Snakeheads. Slave traders. Extortionists. Criminals. Are we not in some ways in Canada "living off the avails" of a crime? Are we not all accomplices?

Living on the reserve had helped me become aware of certain aspects, consequences, of the Indian Act. The house assigned to the school principal had been built originally for the Indian agent, a government-appointed White official paid to administer all aspects of life on reserve. The agent granted passes giving reserve Indians permission to leave, to work for wages, to seek medical treatment. The agent allotted housing, enforced the alcohol interdiction. The agent was the symbol of government control of all aspects of Indian life. Symbolically, in that community, the agent had been replaced by the school principal.
     Indians had originally been granted no rights of Canadian citizenship. Forget the nation-to-nation rhetoric which had preceded treaty negotiations. The goal of the Indian Act was to prepare Indians to assimilate, and as soon as they demonstrated that they had the skills to become part of the mainstream, they would no longer need special status. This was the bait and switch; this was not what First Nations had agreed to.
     In the early years, enfranchisement could be forced upon individuals. At first, there was no concept of "dual citizenship," Canadian and First Nations. As that first student's first claim emphasized, Indians were forced to choose between their Cree identity or Canadian citizenship. If they were enfranchised, the Indian Act said their Indian identity would be cancelled, replaced with rights of full citizenship. Before or until that happened, Indians did not even have the vote. This confusion of legal identity is one of the consequences of someone else, some external authority, determining who is and who is not an Indian. Partly in response to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), Canadian citizenship was granted to Indians in1956 and the right to vote in federal elections was granted in amendments to the Indian Act in 1960.
    Indian status, the Indian Act decreed, was to be determined according to the British tradition, through the male line. White women marrying in and their children became Indians. Indian women marrying out and their children lost Indian status. This imposed system would not be challenged until 1985, after the Charter had guaranteed equality and prohibited discrimination based upon race or gender.
     Reserve land belonged to the Crown which held it in trust for the group. There would be no freehold tenure, no private ownership of reserve land. As Native economist Howard Adams famously put it: the Indian Act imposed life without capital within a capitalist society. Some unilateral amendments to the Act in the early twentieth century had given the government the right to amend the treaties by moving, leasing out, or selling reserve lands which were not being used. Unilateral amendment to a mutual agreement is a breach. However, if the other party refuses to hear your objection, what can you do? Attempt to appeal to a higher authority, the Crown (the King or Queen or their representative in Canada), or to an international forum.
     Although some treaties had previously negotiated access to traditional territory for hunting, fishing, and trapping, for subsistence purposes, anyone who tried to “capitalize” on these rights, in other words, to make money from the available resources, was denied. That was why, on the reserve, Indians could fish with a "square hook," meaning with a net, but it was illegal for Whites to do so. That is also why it was illegal for Indians to sell any game they hunted, or to sell any fish they caught unless they were properly licensed commercial fisherman. That is also why the argument that treaties never signed away "mineral rights" suggests a way to return potential "capital" to the equation, to find an untapped source of income for the people who had "in good faith" agreed to "mutual occupation."
     Indeed, even employment opportunities were limited by the law, the Indian Act. Indians could not seek or accept work without the Indian Agent's permission. People who ignored this part of the law were charged, convicted, and imprisoned. The Indian Act also prohibited access to government employment unless Indian status was relinquished. (I learned this from the man who drove the ferry across the Nelson River, after the provincial road to the big hydro dam at Jenpeg was extended into the community.) Enfranchisement was required before employment was permitted, relinquishing your Indian status to become the same as all other Canadians, expected to pay taxes, given the right to vote, denied the right to live on reserve. This law forbidding employment impacted an entire group, the men and women who volunteered to fight in World War I and II. So many Indian soldiers could not stand up, stand out, be recognized, because accepting army pay meant that they would be enfranchised, their Indian status cancelled, and their families forced to move off reserve. It was a Canadian “don't ask, don't tell.” Except that after the war, Indian veterans were denied the assistance offered other veterans unless they were enfranchised.
    Thousands of First Nations men and women had fought for a country which did not even allow them to vote. It was pressure from these veterans which forced the repeal in 1951 of those aspects of the Indian Act, the Potlatch Law of 1886, which had forbidden cultural gatherings and indigenous religious ceremonies. The ban on social and spiritual activities such as the potlatch, sundance, and powwow dances had been an effort to reduce cultural ties, to impose Christianity as another step towards assimilation. Individuals and family heads who sponsored potlatches had been arrested and imprisoned. Wearing traditional attire was criminalized; sacred regalia had been confiscated and burned.
     Indians were forbidden to will or inherit property. Later amendments to the Indian Act forbade hiring lawyers, a direct attempt to prevent court challenges and land claims. The 1960 amendments to the act brought elected chief and band councils to reserves. Indian Agents were phased out. Funding to manage the reserves still came from the federal government whose bureaucrats still oversaw band council finances.
     The Indian Act imposed external control on all social, political, economic, and spiritual aspects of the lives of First Nations individuals. Oppressive laws made by other people were an organized attempt to force the First Nations to change, to become someone other than who they were.
The Indian Act is a colonial manifesto, the opposite of a Magna Carta. The Indian Act is a law which makes Indians legally inferior, puts them into a child-like minority position as wards of the state where all the important points of their life are proscribed, controlled by outsiders according to British-Canadian cultural tenets. The Indian Act instituted a form of colonization upon the reserves. The Indian Act, written by Whites without consultation and imposed on Indian people, is a document spawned by racism, the unquestioned belief that the White way, Whites, were superior, that Indians were inferior, and that Indians and Whites would both be better off if the Indians were to become White, to assimilate into White society.
    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms signed by Queen Elizabeth II and Prime Minister Trudeau in 1982 resulted in many challenges to the Indian Act, to the ways it did not conform to the human rights and aboriginal rights acknowledged in the Charter. Laws reflect the values of the people who make the laws. The Charter made It illegal to discriminate on the basis of race or gender, yet you can still hear some people argue that the Charter only protects citizens under federal jurisdiction. Or that the Charter does not apply to people living on reserves. Can you believe it? Arguing for the right to discriminate? Reacting, out of fear or self-interest or a belief in one's own superiority, rather than “buying into” a higher ideal, the respect for human dignity and all that that entails.

My cross-cultural education had progressed. I had gathered crumbs of history through encounters with First Nations people on the reserve and in the city. I felt I had a better understanding about what the word racism meant, and how it impacted upon the laws of Canada and the lives of First Nations people. How racism was the foundation of the push for assimilation. How there must be other options, and how those options had to be optional, chosen by First Nations themselves. How the situation had to change, to improve. How there was still so much to be done.
     But what could I do about it? Other than feel that sense of solidarity? Try to be supportive? Politics and power grabs and government deception seemed to be problems. And they went unchecked because of a seeming general ignorance, of racism, of injustice. Or was it an on-going belief in White superiority? Did the majority of Canadians still believe that Whites were superior and that Indians should be forced to assimilate? And what if they did believe that? What could protect a minority group from the racist opinions of a majority? Were there any solutions? What government or government official or elected representative would ever risk relinquishing power, or the power to control resources, or money? Which voters would even suggest it?

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Three years after leaving the North, I began a new job in the federal correctional service. Going through the standard screening with the preventive security officer at Stony Mountain, checking for possible conflicts of interest, checking for names of prisoners, the officer asked me to list criminals I knew personally. I could not think of many. A former student from the reserve whom I had visited in the Youth Detention Centre. Another I had visited in the Health Sciences Centre. No problem, he said, although he did make note of the names and suggested that there might be relatives in the prison population. A former member of the teaching staff of a southern school where I had taught more than ten years before, a man who had murdered his girlfriend. Check. He had been on this officer's caseload, and had transferred out west. An elder who did programming. Check. He was cleared for admission to present workshops. A member of the Citizens Advisory Committee who I knew had had a conviction many years before. Check. (He's a friend of the chief of police, I am told.) A writer who started his career while serving time for armed robbery in Kingston. Check. A couple of draft dodgers at university. Not a problem. He suggested a couple of possible names, but nothing rang a bell. I couldn't think of any more. Rumours of one or two former Oak River high school classmates, fraud and something else, but I doubted that they would have been federal offences.
     Okay. If you think of any more, let me know.
     Done. Selective amnesia.

SHOWER TIME


Pat (again, a name picked from the ether, to prevent any possible embarrassment) is a young guy, which on this tier in this penitentiary makes him somewhat vulnerable, even if he is six foot something and not weak. Youth makes him still impulsive, while he still feels invincible, immune to the risks of foreign substances inserted into his body through various orifices, including self-punctures through his brown skin. He is from Fort Chip in the Northwest Territories. “Skins,” he and his friends proudly identify themselves as, or “Bros,” short for brothers, a brotherhood.
     Speaking to him through the barrier which separates my job from his living unit I notice his teeth. Not the way their whiteness stands out. Rather, the way they look a yellowish-grey, fuzzy, as if moss is growing around the gum line. Recognizing a teachable moment when one speaks to me, I broach the delicate subject of personal hygiene. Toothbrush? Shower time?
“Shower? You never see me in there, do you?“
     Not that I can say I have noticed, as the showers, screened with simple white modesty curtains, are open to workers like him, cleaners, who have the freedom of the range when everyone else is out at work. “You never shower?” I ask in disbelief. Why not? I think, but I don't really have to ask. Showers are a fearful place of exposure. “Don't bend over,” as the saying goes. Places of vulnerability, especially for the young who might be easy prey, subject to pressure for debts incurred in relation to those above-mentioned impulsive and self-destructive choices. But, how can you live with yourself? my surprise seems to say.
     Pat just laughs. Everyone has his own wash basin and flush toilet in his own cell. “I take a whore's bath,” he says with pride.
     Although I laugh in surprise, I know instantly what he means. My curiosity is more literal. “I'm afraid to ask where you learned that expression!” I fear the worst.
     “Dusters,” he explains. He is an avid reader of “dusters,” western
cowboys-and-Indians genre fiction.
     Really? What would an Indian boy pick up from dusters, besides a colourful expression or two about “whore's baths”? Would he identify with the cowboys or the Indians? Or the whores? What are the Indian role models doing? Are his heroes always cowboys, Indian-hunters, or are they the enemies of cowboys and of the civilization for which those cowboys bushwhacked? Art and culture are mirrors; they help us see ourselves, aid in the process of identification. But what happens if the reflections are distorted, if the images we see are grey or fuzzy?
     What if the only familiar faces we see are the mugshots on wanted posters?
     What does a guy have to do to feel “wanted” around here?

KEEPING ALIVE

As my mother was alone and ill in British Columbia, I was able to transfer from the Prairie to the Pacific Region, and from multi-level to minimum security. I had to start learning all over again, policies and procedures, and cross-cultural communication. I had been forewarned. By my brother: “BC is three or four years behind Winnipeg, but after you've been here a while, you don't notice.” By others in the service: “They do things differently,” and ”They have different attitudes out there,” meaning institutional culture, regional differences.
     From senior staff I learned new catchphrases: “That was then; this is now.” And “Rules are made to be broken.” And from the inmates, especially old junkies battered from years in logging camps and winters on skid roads in the city. There the mantra was: “Places like this keep me alive.” He meant, without prison sentences, he would have been dead of an overdose ages ago. (Not to imply that he had no access to drugs inside, just that it was easier for him to choose to avoid them.) And it struck me how the same was also true for First Nations inmates, although there were fewer of them here in the Pacific Region population than had been so visible in the Prairie Region.
     But it was true. Places like Stony Mountain Institution kept First Nations spirituality alive. The new Charter had guaranteed the right to practice the religion of your choice, and policy meant that the service was obliged to provide suitable spiritual advisors and counsellors. Men who may never have seen a pipe at home, or attended a sweat, participated in cultural rituals during their incarcerations. You could actually see self-knowledge grow into self-acceptance and the very best kind of pride. I listened as one Elder responded to an inmate complaint that prison cut him off from nature. “Everything on the Earth is of the Earth,” the Elder said. “Touch your walls and you're connected to nature.”
     In the same way institutions like the prisons have honoured Native culture, the reserves themselves have preserved much that First Nations value. As long as the reserve is there, a First Nations person has a home or a home to go back to. “Why do people stay in those remote, impoverished places,” Southerners ask. “Why don't they just move to the cities and get jobs?” It is a question loaded with cultural assumptions. Maybe they wish to retain that connection to place, to the Earth which sustains them. Maybe, if they leave, they will have no way of getting home. Why do city people own cottages by lakes and rivers, paddle on long canoe trips, send their children to summer camps? Because there is something missing in urban life which requires an accommodation. Some connection which has to be renewed or, like a house plant we forget to water, it will shrivel and die. Maybe they want to remain close to their people, to family and friends, to the human relationships which sustain.

FRASER RIVER - COAST SALISH

Moving to British Columbia is a cultural adjustment for anyone. But where First Nations were concerned, differences from the Prairies stood out. First of all, apartheid is much less obvious in BC. First Nations reserves are right here, in the Lower Mainland, within what seems like town and city limits, in Hope, Chilliwack, Abbotsford, and Vancouver. First Nations people are much more visible. External symbols of First Nations cultures are different from those of plains culture—totem poles, dugout canoes, masks and carvings, button blankets, woven Salish blankets, woven baskets, dip nets, salmon drying racks, headbands and headdresses of cedar, feather, and mountain goat wool. These visuals stress the inextricable link between culture and landscape, culture and environment. Where prairie people lived off the buffalo, West Coast people gave thanks for cedar as their tree of life and for food which swam to their doors.
    At work, the first question I had to adjust was one I used in my introductory information gathering from new clients. “Are you Treaty?” Meaning, Have you got your Treaty Card, the registration from your Band which identifies you as an Indian in Canada? (One reason workers need to know this is because it determines who is responsible for health care costs.)
     “Treaty? What's that?”
     There are virtually no treaties in British Columbia. Registered Indians carry Status Cards.
     No treaties? How can that be? How can we three million plus non-Indigenous British Columbians be squatters, here without permission, without an agreement for mutual occupation? That just does not seem right.

At one work-related cultural event, an Elder asked me if I spoke Halkomelem?
     Halkomelem? (Spelling varies; Halq'emeylem) I could barely repeat the word. I had never heard it before. Halkomelem is the mother tongue of Hal's people, known as the Coast Salish, and living from the Fraser Canyon to the Fraser mouth in Georgia Strait, up the coast, down the coast around Puget Sound, and along the eastern edges of Vancouver Island. I had owned a Salish loom in Winnipeg but I thought it was Scandinavian. I left it in the back alley when I moved. I had been to Ireland; I could tell you the difference between “Red” Irish and “Black” Irish, but I had never heard of Hals or the Coast Salish people or the Halkomelem language.
     I was lucky, through work and contacts, to continue to have the opportunity to attend more functions in local Big Houses where many more Elders were present. The Big House is what people on West Coast reserves call a building which looks like a longhouse but is really more like a large community arena, with a dirt floor where the ice would be, and wooden bench seating in tiers up three of the four walls. There is a large opening between the rafters with a raised roof above it, a space for smoke to escape, but covered to keep the rain out. There is a large fire in the centre of the dirt floor. The fire provides heat and additional light; as the evening, the days, progress, younger men carry in huge chunks of wood from the woodpile out back, four-foot lengths of cedar and fir which produce a pirouette of sparks seeking the sky every time a log is tossed on the firepit.
     The purpose of all the gatherings in the Big House is for people to come together. The ones I attended were to introduce initiates. To watch them dance. To hear them sing. But other gatherings celebrate a life or the anniversary of a death or the installation of a grave post, or the transfer of a name to another member of the family. There is still a taboo about speaking about things that go on in the Big House, from the days when the dances were illegal and families who organized a potlatch were fined or jailed. And, I am lumping things together here which is another offense, Pan-Indianism. Because I attended these feasts in Coast Salish territory and in Gitxsan territory, lands and peoples separated by thousands of kilometres here in BC, and inhabited by people with different languages, different cultures, different histories, different goals and desires.
     In the South, in Coast Salish territory, where the people speak the Halkomelem language, the phrase used by the emcee at the winter dance is “You are called to witness.” At a specified time during the dancing, before the tables are carried in and laden with food for the feasting, the drumming stops and the family that is giving the feast, the dance, takes the floor and calls out the names of individuals in the audience, repeating each time “You are called to witness.” The witnesses are invited to come down with the family, and each one is offered a gift (blankets, clothing, household goods). Family members file past the honourees and hand them coins from the rolls of quarters they have brought for the occasion, as a payment for the important work the visitor is doing, by attending, and witnessing the event that occasioned the dance. In a symbolic way, the witnesses are being paid to remember what happens at this event, to report it in the future. It is a form of oral documentation. On this day in this place you witnessed this person do this. It is oral history, but more than oral, because it involves actions as well as words. But I hesitate to say too much, to make a mistake. When the witness is called, named, honoured, he or she may be offered the opportunity to speak. The talking stick or the microphone or both are passed, and the congregation waits for Elder wisdom.
     The most memorable one for me that I heard was an Elder who insisted: “We are here to help each other through.”
     Yes. I can buy that. Those are words to live by. Those Elders, and those celebrations in the Big Houses, legal again since the early 1950s and guaranteed in the Charter, let me see for myself Indians dancing again. Even once, the Skhway-Khwey dancers, special hereditary masks passed down matrilineally, inherited through the female side of the family, and brought out only for very special occasions.
     After one such winter dance, walking alone to my car in the parking lot, I climbed in and just sat there, gripping the steering wheel, sobbing. Sometimes Elders ask if people are all right because they know the power inside the Big House can be overwhelming. I could not articulate why I wept. Something about the sense of community, how those hundreds of people inside all belonged there, and knew that they belonged there. That the culture which has existed for at least ten thousand years still exists and is still strong.

Those words about helping each other through may have come from an Elder with whom I had subsequent encounters. En route to a gathering in a distant community, he riding shotgun, me driving the company van through dark tunnels, fumbling for the headlight switch, he nodded off somewhere past the first hour of the trip. After we got home safely, I teased him about his comfort level. He must have been confident in my driving if he was relaxed enough to fall asleep, eh? He responded with a smile: “Maybe I was praying.”

SKEENA RIVER - GITXSAN

One day in my office at work, in 1991, a First Nations inmate sat, silent, dejected; the provincial court judgment had just been released. Judge McEachern had ruled against the petitioners in the case Delgamuukw vs. Regina (the Crown). What was so depressing, what made First Nations people first so sad and then so angry, was the judge's insulting ruling that oral history does not count. That nothing the Gitxsan First Nation representatives had said, nothing they had presented to support their case, was worth anything compared to the paper, the documents presented in support of the Crown's case. It was as if the judge were proclaiming that nothing about your culture has any value; that your culture is inferior, White culture is superior, because I say so, because that's the way we do things here in Canada. It felt like an insult to all First Nations. As a White person, I felt ashamed.
     I did not know at that moment that later I would have the opportunity to visit Gitxsan territory, communities like Hazelton and Kispiox, along the Skeena River and its tributaries like the Bulkley and the Kispiox rivers, in northern British Columbia. At one ceremony in the Feast Hall, I witnessed Elders being gifted red and black blankets with white buttons while crowds dressed like mummers in Halloween masks danced a conga line through the room. One of the elders walking around the hall was Delgamuukw, a young-looking man with white hair, wearing a black vest stitched with a green frog design. The frog represents the family crest of the Frog clan to which he belongs. This feast I attended was before Judge McEachern's ruling from the Supreme Court of British Columbia was overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada which confirmed that BC First Nations who have never yet signed treaties do have aboriginal rights and that their own form of historic documentation, the oral history witnessed at feasts, the songs and recitations inherited, passed down from one generation to another, must be accorded respect equal to that of the written documents of the White settlers. Delgamuukw is hereditary chief of just one of the four main clans, the chief whose name is used in the short form to identify the court case.
     At that same feast in Gitxsan territory I met Antgulilibix, hereditary chief of another, the Fireweed clan. At the time, she was introduced as Mary and I did not know the role she had played in the McEachern decision. She was the Elder who attempted to testify by singing one of the ancestral songs into the record, as proof of the Gitxsan claim, as evidence that her culture exists, has existed for millennia, and has its own culturally-accepted methods for documenting and transmitting the history. Under ordinary circumstances, the song she sang in court would be sung at one of the gatherings in the Feast House, before witnesses, who would be expected to remember, and she would pass the song down, when she was ready, to a descendant identified as capable of fulfilling the responsibility. Antgulilibix' testifying in BC Supreme Court had happened in 1987, before I moved to BC, and I was not aware of her history until I saw a cartoon of the incident in an actual history text book. [Lutz, p.276] Evidently the judge had interrupted her song, had referred to it as “a performance” not appropriate for a court of law, and proclaimed that he himself had a “tin ear” oblivious to sound, meaning, or nuance. His comments were disrespectful, his ignorance seemingly deliberate. It was as if he was proud of himself for not being willing to listen or to learn.
     In that courtroom, Delgamuukw had tried to explain. “My power is carried in my House's histories, songs, dances, and crests. It is recreated at the Feast when the histories are told, the songs and dances performed and the crests displayed. . . In this way, the law, the Chief, the territory and the Feast become one.” [Regan, p.163] I do not know whether Antgulilibix lived to hear her song, her self, her culture vindicated when the Supreme Court of Canada overruled Judge McEachern, in favour of Delgamuukw, in 2006. Fifteen years after the original racist decision. One hundred forty-five years after British Columbia joined the Canadian Confederation. One hundred fifty-eight years after prospectors from around the globe had rushed into the homeland of the Halkomelem-speakers, seeking Fraser River gold, without making any culturally-appropriate arrangements for "mutual occupation," as even British law required, with the nations into whose territory they flooded. Two hundred and thirteen years after Alexander Mackenzie reached the Pacific Ocean, “from Canada, by land.”

RETURN TO the RIVER

After my mother died, and prompted by my up-coming tenth anniversary, when I would have been “locked in” until retirement, I left the correctional service. I went and camped out for a year on the ranch where my mother had grown up, in British Columbia's Kettle Valley.

The Kettle River

The book had fallen off the shelf, face down, splayed open at the message: The old has died and the new cannot yet be born. Wait for the door to open. She closed her office door and never went back. She moved to the ranch in Kettle Valley to wait.
     She tells herself she has moved to the valley because she feels empty and alone. Abandoned by a mother who died and left her, a mother she felt she really had never known, she had begun a quest to unearth her secrets, to try to get closer to her. To walk in her footsteps. Yearning to understand, to connect. Her sky-blue trailer sits beneath a canopy of Ponderosa Pine, practically underneath Ingram Bridge. The circle of her yard marks an O in the northeast quadrant of the X made by the river crossing beneath the trestle, in the V made by Bubar Road meeting the Crowsnest Highway. Parallel to the vanished tracks, the wavy blue line of the Kettle River flows past her door. If she crosses the yard, bending through the opening in the decrepit page wire fence, treks to the edge of the abandoned railbed, she can jump into the current below. If she walks downstream, under the rusty girders, where the bank flattens, the water laps gently at the grass, she can wade over to the island of snagged driftwood and alluvium nursing Red Osier Dogwood and young poplar, in medias res.
     At night when the highway traffic is sporadic, the ker-chunks from the bridge deck low and slow, the hum from the river fills her warm rooms. With trickle trills where the water meets the rocks and splits, laughing, into strands around them. As if the stones themselves are singing to her, as they too bathe in moonlight.
     She finds, accommodating herself to the new space, scanning for the proper spot for her desk, that she has to turn her back to the river. Otherwise, she is mesmerized by its murmur of dreamful ease. The Kettle waters call her, subverting her resolve to work, to dig things up, and write them down.
     The Kettle rises far to the north, in the Monashee Mountains, west of Nakusp. Like a goddess twisting and turning, her many arms inscribe her line into the hills, through the soil, revealing the story of the land layer by layer to the bedrock. Like a tree, the Kettle has many twirling branches. The West Fork, the Main, and the North Fork which enters the Main at Grand Forks in the Sunshine Valley. Along her way, she picks up smaller streams—Rock Creek, Nicholson Creek, Bubar Creek, Ingram Creek, Boundary Creek—enticing them to join her, braiding them into her thicker strand. She meanders with proper disregard across and back over the 49th parallel and across again before she merges with the Columbia at Kettle Falls, Washington. The giant splash of the falls has been drowned behind the big dam that holds back the waters, releasing them slowly to the mother river, the Gorge, the blue Pacific.
     The people who live with the Kettle say: “In her summer mode, you have to lie down in her to get wet.” To lie down in her. Like the fish asleep at noon. Like the beavers who swim home through her. Deadwood floats past deep swimming holes, tube launches, canoe landings. Old bridge abutments mark what used to be the easiest fords. On calm days, her clear waters mirror the shining hills. If the cottonwoods shiver, she trembles. She repeats the whispers of the pines.
     The Kettle is named from the roiling cauldrons found in some of her arms, especially at the rapids up Deer Creek. Years, eons of cascading current have worn a hollow into the bedrock in which the white water appears to boil and bubble. The kettle in turn traps boulders that fall in, whirling them dizzily in the rush of the eddy. The gyrations of the granite fragment erode the inside of the kettle, rounding and deepening it. At the same time, the surging swirl tumbles the broken chunk of rock, smoothing its edges each time it crashes against the basin wall, toiling to sculpt it to an unnatural sphere. The rattle, the drumming of the boulder on the sides, on the bottom, of the kettle is drowned in the sound of the falls.
     The people who love this river collect these rock spheres, as big as bowling balls. The Indians used to cover them in leather and play games with them, they say. Uncle at the ranchhouse next door keeps his with the other artifacts he has found on walks over his family land or on horseback rides up into the rocky hills. He has stone tools used for hunting, tanning, cooking; griddle rocks and pestles; stone blades and scrapers; a jade adze, stone hammers, and a long polished rectangular slab ground to an angled edge at both ends. He has a seemingly endless collection of arrowheads, of every shape and size, from the whitest quartz all the way through blue, gray, charcoal-coloured flints and cherts, rust and blood-red jaspers, to black basalt. “Some of these,” he explains to her, “could have been here for 10,000 years. This, I found on the exact spot where I found my father, dead of a heart attack, when I was seven years old. This one was way up high, at the top of that ridge.”
     She tries to divine from Uncle the secret of finding arrowheads. “There is no secret,” he insists. “The only secret is that I don't look for them; I keep my eyes open, especially after a rain or when the soil has been tilled, and they just appear. Other people can walk right by and never notice them, but I just seem to see.”
     Mum could do that too. When they used to wander together out into the prairie fields, the rich flat glacial till dotted with granite erratics, they picked stones to add to their collections. The white ones, the sparklers for making fire, and unusual colours, seduced her, the wink of mica, magpie trinkets whose shininess caught the eye. It was Mum who found the arrowheads, scrapers, spearblades, the stone hammers the Indians used for pounding or for tethers.
     As a girl, she never thought to ask her mother whether she had collected rocks as a child, what kind of things she had found when she scoured the fields at home in BC, what living on a ranch was like. When Uncle was seven years old, in September, 1937, Mum would have been eleven.
     "Tell us about Grandpa, Mum. What was your Dad like?"
     "He died, when I was twelve years old."
     That was all she ever said. But this ranch, this valley, this river, was her father's world. The picture of him driving the team through the ford would have been taken right along here. He died in that field. He is buried up there, in that graveyard on the hillside, where the lilacs bloom every spring. A granite stone marks the spot.
     This is my Father's world
     And to my listening ears
     All nature sings and round me rings
     The music of the spheres.
     The rogue hymn had inserted itself by accident into the funeral service. She had not thought of the river or of the ranch at that time. She had waited, her eyes and ears alert, until the book had landed at her feet, until the door had opened.
     "Once you have dipped your feet in the Kettle," they say, "you always return."
     Return when empty. It is a life skill. In her frantic twirling and spinning, she had forgotten. But that is what she is doing now, by intuition. Breathing in, bathing in the numinous, in a landscape alive with the dead, shivering, whispering, drumming, singing to her. The river rocking her to sleep. The water lulling her to dream.
     The arms of her mother's chair cradle her as she sits working at her desk. Divining the secrets of the stones. Keeping her windows and doors open.

FRASER RIVER - PROTOCOL

The Indians in the Kettle Valley moved to the reservation at Colville, Washington, after the boundary was surveyed in the 1850s. But there are still many First Nations in British Columbia. At another southern gathering I attended, in a hotel, not a Big House, a federal Indian politician, Chief of the Assembly of First Nations at that time, himself a Cree from northern Manitoba, made a little speech. He started out by commenting on the ceremonial opening, the singing of O Canada, “our home on native land.” Then he made another little joke after being gifted with his blanket and handed his symbolic two-bit coins. Teasing and one-upsmanship are such a part of the multiple First Nations cultures.
     "Thank you," he said respectfully. "Thank you for inviting me into your territory. Thank you for blanketing me. Thank you for the quarters.
     But hey, haven't you guys out here ever heard of loonies?"

He can still joke. We can still joke. We have to be able to laugh. First Nations culture insinuates itself in many subtle ways. Every time I see a t-shirt walking towards me, or earrings, or a garden ornament, featuring Kokopeli, the Southwestern Trickster, I give a little snicker. They think of him as a musician, a flutist, but do they know that the hump on the Trickster's back is a large engorged penis he is burdened to lug around with him? That that's why he is associated with gardens, with seeds?
     It's a life skill, this ability to laugh, at ourselves, our imperfections, at our human condition. To believe in and respect each other, willing and able to learn, to work and live together.

TRUTH and RECONCILIATION

As part of the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was established to provide a forum for former students to speak and to educate the general public about what happened. Their mandate is clearly stated on their website, trc.ca. In February, 2012, the TRC released its Interim Report, They Came For the Children. Even as a former teacher, a former reserve resident, as a student of history, and as someone who had sub-contracted to work on part of the residential schools settlement, there are facts in this report which are news to me.
     I had been aware that, as part of the plan to assimilate the Indians, the government had set up the Indian Residential Schools System almost immediately, in place of the promised on-reserve schools. Indian children had been taken away from their families and communities to large industrial-style boarding schools where they were forbidden to speak their mother tongue. The schools were run by teachers and administrators employed under contracts negotiated with the churches. As the system was generally underfunded, relying on charity and missionary zeal, conditions were often abysmal. To make matters worse, some children were centred out for physical, sexual, or psychological abuse.
     I believed that the idea of residential schools was based on the racist assumption--that White culture, Western Civilization, was superior to First Nations cultures and, furthermore, that First Nations children, their communities, and Canada as a whole would be improved if First Nations were assisted to assimilate as quickly as possible into “mainstream” White Canadian culture. I recognized that these are racist assumptions.
     I assumed that these racist assumptions were probably held by the majority of White Canadians during the years the residential schools were in operation, from Confederation to 1996. Most Canadians also believe that education improves our opportunities in life. The more impoverished our beginnings, the greater the likelihood of improvement. And ever since treaties were signed in the 1800s, First Nations have been told “Education is the new buffalo.”
     I also believed that the First Nations had asked for schools to educate their children and that the federal government was obliged to provide them as part of the conditions signed in the nation-to-nation treaties by which the First Nations had agreed to "mutual occupation," to permit settlement in traditional territories and to accept permanent settlements for themselves on land reserved for Indians. This also, for the most part, is true.
     I also knew that the Metis were not part of the treaty-making process and that the federal government did not assume any legal responsibility towards them or their education. A Supreme Court ruling in January, 2013, may change this old understanding of rights and responsibilities.
     As an educator, I knew a bit about the history of education. In Canada, public schools were locally initiated, generated and paid for by local parents and taxpayers who were usually one and the same. As a student of history, I knew that, by law, outlined in the British North America Act, now called the Constitution Act of 1867, education is a local matter and thus is a provincial jurisdiction, paid for by municipal and provincial taxes. That in theory, taxpayers paid for education because an educated population was a benefit to all, not just to the individuals involved. And that this model of education supported by local taxes could not be applied to reserves for two reasons. First, the constitution clearly stated that all Indians, no matter where they lived in Canada, were the responsibility of the federal government. And second, because there was no tax base on reserves, as residents do not own and cannot sell the land. The funding for schools for First Nations children comes solely from the federal government. Once the treaties were signed and the Indian Act passed, the federal government, as sole funder, assumed it alone would determine how and what the First Nations students were taught, by whom, and where. He who pays the piper calls the tune. Money as the means of control. Money talks, and in Canada, it only speaks English or French.
     I also knew that in England, where most of the English-speaking Canadian ideals originated, children attended boarding schools and military schools from a very young age. They where separated from parents and sent to places where abuse, especially student on student abuse, was rampant. These old ways had lead to the values of a “stiff upper lip” and “what doesn't kill us makes us stronger” which we associate with Victorian child-rearing techniques. I also knew, as a teacher who has worked with many students for whom English is a second language, that “immersion” is believed to be the fastest and most effective way for students to learn a second language in a school setting.
     I also knew, from my years of teaching both on reserve and off, that many if not most teachers go into teaching believing that they are doing good, helping children develop, making it possible for them to reach their full potential, to become healthy, happy, contributing members of Canadian society. Teachers did not and do not intend to harm children. The instances where individual harm arises, cases of physical, psychological, or sexual abuse, are personal, crimes against the person, not systemic, and not, never condoned. I suppose, as a former teacher, I identify with other teachers, and I hate to see everyone tarred with the brush of abuser and criminal just because they volunteered to work within a system. I know there were and are good teachers, and that many residential school students developed respectful loving supportive relationships with the staff members who cared for them.
     Before reading the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Interim Report, I had heard the phrase “getting rid of the Indian in the children.” I took this to mean that the schools were given the mandate to train the children in the new ways, to prepare them to assimilate, to become a part of Canadian society. Although the phrasing certainly implies that “the Indian” part of the child constituted an undesirable element, I chose to read it as a focus on the future rather than on the past. I understood how taking the children away, “scooping” them, and placing them in schools far away, where visits were almost impossible and even returning home was difficult, was an emotional hardship for everyone involved. The children were fearful, the parents sorrowful, and the results of the separation succeeded in driving an even greater wedge between generations than we see in other families. For the message, sometimes voiced, sometimes unvoiced, was that your families and your homes represent the old ways and that you must abandon the old ways to prepare for the future.
     I did not fully appreciate the racist implications, the assumption that White culture is better. I never thought about possible ways to be or to become a strong culturally-based person able to function outside that mainstream culture, to integrate into a larger society without becoming subsumed by it, without assimilating and disappearing.
     But this is what I did not know.
     That the goal of separating the children from families and communities was not merely to educate them to enter Canadian society. The goal was, literally, by destroying First Nations culture, by assimilating First Nations people into mainstream Canada, to reduce government costs by eliminating the people to whom Canada was indebted. Once Indian children were assimilated, the government and bureaucratic thinking went, that chunk of the Canadian federal budget set aside for the education of First Nations children and the maintenance of people on reserves would no longer be needed. Taxpayer money would be saved by eliminating one drain on the federal budget, this fiduciary responsibility to Indians. First Nations would be enfranchised tax-paying citizens, no different from anyone else. In effect, the plan was to undermine the promise of the treaties by “disappearing” the people with whom the treaties had been signed. There would be no “Indian problem” because there would no longer be any Indians. This was a betrayal, a deliberate reneging on the letter and the spirit of the treaties signed with First Nations. This made the residential schools system an attempted genocide, an attempt to destroy a people by destroying their culture.